Skip to main content

Librarians as Archaeologists




No, not Dr. Carter. According to Scott Nicholson in "Digital Library Archaeology: a conceptual framework for understanding library use through artifact-based evaluation" librarians have a thing or two to learn from archaeologists. I think all of us in the information field have a thing or two to learn about the way people search, and looking at another fields' examples certainly can't hurt.


"Everyday people" don't go into a library thinking...now what keyword terms can I use to access this item...and oh, yes, I see a "see also" link here, so let me follow that to narrow down my search query...

They can go to google and type in anything they want and get information online. AKA using natural language queries. So why can't library catalogs function this way? I understand we are working toward that, but it doesn't seem to me like information professionals are paying attention to what their users are telling them, either verbally or through their searching.


Daniel Rose says that "Today, we have largely moved away from Boolean query syntax" in "Reconciling Information-Seeking Behavior With Search User Interfaces for the Web...but that's not entirely true with library catalogs. We really do need to know how people, not just librarians, look for information. As Nicholson suggested, we should be archaeologists, using digital clues like they use pottery shards (498, 2006). This can get tricky though, because of privacy issues.


Something else that's fun [maybe i am just a geek] is letting people pick your brain to see how you search and navigate information. I'm pretty sure I've talked about this before, but I participated in this research for WebJunction before, where I got to "think out loud" while navigating this webpage. I felt so awesome! Like I was really contributing to science. But say I followed somebody around watching them search for items in the library- they are bound to feel uncomfortable and change their actual search patterns. Nicholson points out that there are steps that can be taken to combat this (512, 513), but it's always best to observe real people in their environments, if possible.


So about the catalog searching...Rose shows how Altavista is a more user-friendly version of the "see" and "see also" references in the catalog on p. 798 by showing how you can "refine your search" and then listing more focused terms than search term the user entered. I think this could also happen with the library catalog, so FRBR people, keep this in mind!


Anything to get more people using the library, right?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

myspace versus facebook

When will the madness end? Now the myspace buzz is out, facebook is in. I even saw a mashup [can't find it again!] that proclaimed facebook the genius brainchild of social networking systems, and myspace the red-headed step-child who scrubs the floors. Okay, maybe it wasn't really that bad, but it was pretty brutal. And I'm supposed to give a conference presentation about how helpful myspace can be for libraries? I'm going to have to dig pretty hard for that one. Yikes!

MySpace goes org

I created a generic myspace page for a public library as my final project in Doc Martens' LIS web class in Fall 2006. I also work as a reference librarian at a public library. My fellow librarian and comrade liked it, and thought he would show it to our library director, who also liked it, and asked me to tailor it to our library, Stillwater Public. I no longer have the beta-version available, but here is what the "finished" product looks like. Luckily for our library, we do not receive e-rate funding, so we do not have to block social networking and blogging websites, like other schools and libraries do. Patrons come to our library to access the internet and www.myspace.com, more specifically, because it's banned in so many places. I put up signs last week advertising that our library is now on myspace, and got a few extra friends requests. Hopefully, as word spreads, more people will be interested in joining our friends' list and getting all sorts of up

Libraries the keystone for public access?

Bertot, Jaeger, Langa and McClure wrote this article about public access and internet in libraries, and how the federal government has "drafted" libraries to help the people without any compensation; monetary or otherwise. So essentially, libraries are getting dumped on by Big Brother and Uncle Sam, and especially so in times of crisis and natural disaster. Why? The geniuses at FEMA and DHS and all those other government agencies helping poor people have slowly been making their forms and information solely available online. Because people who can't afford to feed themselves probably have access to a computer. It just makes sense, right? WRONG. So, instead of creating offices to help these people use the computers to find the information, they direct the people to the nation's libraries. They are giving people references to the library but not giving libraries extra money, funding, or anything of the sort to help them out. They have shifted the burden of aiding the